Large investors are buying up single-family homes, which is affecting rental prices and home ownership. Does this trend shape the housing market? A new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) sheds light on the growing presence of institutional investors in the single-family rental market and the factors influencing their rise. This article examines how the financial crisis of 2007-2009 paved the way for these large investors to enter the market and what factors fueled their growth.

Seize opportunities:

The financial crisis presented a unique opportunity for institutional investors. With the market flooded with foreclosed homes, local auctions offered the opportunity to acquire properties in bulk. This was particularly attractive due to:

• Economies of scale: Purchasing a large number of homes at once allowed for more efficient management and potentially lower costs per unit.
• Pricing power: The enormous purchase volume alone gave institutional investors considerable influence over the setting of rental prices in certain markets.

Beyond auctions:

Institutional investors did not limit themselves to auctions, however. They also participated in initiatives such as Fannie Mae’s REO-to-Rental program, which offered foreclosed properties in areas particularly affected by the crisis.

Financial strength:

Institutional investors had a clear advantage in financing their purchases. Compared to retail investors and individual buyers, they had access to a wider range of financing sources. These included:

• Private Equity Funds
• Public equity and bonds
• Securitization of Rental income
• State-backed loans

A changing credit landscape:

While institutional investors benefited from a variety of financing options, the situation was very different for traditional homebuyers. Mortgage banks had tightened their lending standards, making it more difficult for many to qualify for a home after the crisis. This further shifted the playing field in favor of institutional investors who could provide cash up front.

The technological advantage:

Technological advances played a crucial role in enabling institutional investors to efficiently manage large portfolios. Digital platforms simplified property acquisition and enabled targeted purchases based on specific investment criteria. Online portals also facilitated tenant management by allowing tenants to electronically search for rental properties, submit applications and pay rent.

The influence of institutional investors on the real estate market

The emergence of institutional investors in the single-family rental market has sparked debate about the potential consequences. This part examines the findings of the GAO report on the impact of these investors on various aspects of the housing market.

Possible benefits:

The GAO report acknowledges that institutional investors may have contributed to some positive developments in the housing market, including:

• Stabilizing neighborhoods: Following the financial crisis, many neighborhoods experienced vacancy and deterioration due to foreclosures. Purchases by institutional investors may have helped stabilize these areas by filling vacant homes and improving property maintenance.

Possible disadvantages:

While there are some potential benefits, the GAO report also raises concerns about the impact of institutional investors:

• Impact on the home ownership rate: A significant portion of the single-family rental market is now owned by institutional investors, raising concerns that fewer homes are available for purchase, which could make home ownership more difficult, particularly for first-time buyers.

Uncertainties and need for more data:

The GAO report acknowledges that the full impact of institutional investors on the real estate market remains unclear due to limited data and the lack of a consistent definition of the term “institutional investor.” Here are some of the key uncertainties highlighted in the report:

• Impact on rents: The extent to which institutional investors contribute to rising rents is unclear. More data is needed to understand their pricing strategies and their impact on rental markets in different regions.
• Impact on clearance rates: There is no data on how institutional ownership affects renter eviction rates. Understanding this aspect is critical to assessing rental housing stability and affordability.

Policy considerations and further research

The increasing presence of institutional investors in the single-family rental market raises important policy questions. This part examines potential policy considerations and areas for further research identified in the GAO report.

Political considerations:

• Data collection and standardization: To better understand their impact on the real estate market, it is important to find a common definition of the term “institutional investor” and improve data collection. This data could serve as a basis for developing targeted policies.
• Promoting home ownership: If reduced opportunities to purchase a home are a concern, policymakers could consider initiatives to support first-time homebuyers, such as down payment assistance programs or tax relief.
• Balancing investor activity and affordability: A key challenge is to encourage investment in rental housing while ensuring affordability for tenants. Policymakers could consider areas such as rental assistance programs or tax breaks for investors that maintain affordable rents.

Further research:

The GAO report highlights the need for further research in several areas to fully understand the influence of institutional investors:

• Investor strategies: A deeper understanding of institutional investors’ acquisition and pricing strategies as well as their long-term plans for their rental portfolios would be beneficial.
• Geographical impact: Examining differences in institutional investor activity across geographic locations and real estate markets could provide valuable insights.
• Results for tenants: More data are needed to assess the impact of institutional ownership on tenant experiences, such as vacancy rates, responsiveness to maintenance, and overall satisfaction.

By taking these policy considerations into account and conducting further research, policymakers can work toward creating a housing market that benefits both investors and renters while ensuring that home ownership opportunities remain.

Outlook:

The rise of institutional investors in the single-family rental market is a complex issue with potential benefits but also challenges. As the market continues to evolve, continued research and informed policy decisions are critical to fostering a healthy and balanced housing market ecosystem.

Diploma

The emergence of institutional investors in the single-family rental market represents a significant shift in the housing landscape. This four-part series, based on the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, examines the factors behind their rise, their potential impact on the market, and considerations for the future.

Key findings:

• The financial crisis of 2007-2009 provided an opportunity for institutional investors to enter the single-family rental home market through bulk purchases at auctions and programs such as Fannie Mae’s REO-to-Rental initiative.
• Their access to capital, combined with technological advances, enabled them to manage large portfolios efficiently.
• While institutional investors may have helped stabilize neighborhoods, there are concerns about their impact on homeownership rates, rental prices and tenant experiences.

The way forward:

To address the complexity of this problem, a multi-pronged approach is required:

• Data and standardization: Consistent data collection and a clear definition of the term ‘institutional investor’ are crucial for effective policy-making.
• Political considerations: Considering measures such as promoting home ownership, supporting affordable rents and improving data collection can help ensure a balanced housing market.
• Further research: A deeper understanding of investor strategies, geographic differences and tenant outcomes is critical to decision-making in future strategies.

Looking to the future Promoting healthy competition, ensuring access to homeownership and ensuring affordable rents for all remain key priorities. By prioritizing data-driven decision-making and continuous research, we can create a housing market that thrives on innovation while meeting the needs of investors and residents.

---

ALSO READ:

Real estate market forecasts for the next 5 years (2024–2028)

Real estate market forecasts for the next 2 years

Real estate market predictions for 2024: Will the real estate market crash?

Real estate market forecasts: Profits expected in 8 of the next 10 years

Is the real estate market cooling down faster than expected?

Is the real estate market changing? Key trends to watch out for (April report)