close
close

Uno a uno: Analysis of the Pesímo partido de la Roja de Gareca


Uno a uno: Analysis of the Pesímo partido de la Roja de Gareca

The selection of Chile urgently needed to make a victory in the eliminators to win again in the dream of the classification of the 2026 World Cup. Por eso Ricardo Gareca presents a formation with numerous changes related to the July change in front of Argentina. Without embargo, that’s not all. Here, the analysis of the jugadores de la Roja.

Gabriel Arias: una tarde ingrata. In the first three months of the Bolivian conspiracy. That’s right, it’s the mayor’s responsibility.

Mauricio Isla: This project is obvious but defends many problems. In the second half of the 20th century, the Bolivian state was not and could not anchor itself at the door before the construction of Terceros.

Matias Catalan: What many people had to do with the Bolivian delants was dependent on Chilean propaganda. The ball was chosen in pelotazo as Bolivia’s first game. In the second moment it was also a paradox and looking back, Roberto Fernández was no longer intercepted. I was in action in the second half of the time, but Vizcarra had to avoid it at all costs. Además, quedó suspended ante Brasil.

Paulo Diaz: No, you don’t have a good intention. The second moment the place was not close and no more stamp arrived. You threw it over the end. Also, it was suspended by yellows for the duelling before the Scratch. Bad presentation.

Gabriel Suazo: Obviously deliberate, but it was not on the market. In the second moment of the Bolivian Civil War, Terceros took the lead and when they entered the area, they provoked a gold rush that completely overthrew the defensive bloc.

Erick Pulgar: Damn the pelota that generates the opponent that ends up in the Bolivian Gulf. This happened right at the beginning and he was constantly overwhelmed. Received yellow and was suspended against Brazil.

Carlos Palacios: Only good level cuts. It was much worse for me than before Argentina, but I lost my balance and didn’t finish until later. Al debe.

Dario Osorio: Bad decisions, but the protagonist and the preoccupation with work on the planet don’t have much to do with Roja. Fue replaced the 60′.

Victor Davila: Most of the time, my intention was to work on it afterwards. It wasn’t that late and it only ended after a long time.

Eduardo Vargas: I was a little more involved; he confirmed a serious injury to Lampe to take the game and finish the match 1-1. In the second year I had a driving license that was about to arrive, but I had to serve the offensive official that the Roja needed.

Ben Brereton: This means that I am the one who is most active, the one who is the one who works and collaborates with him the most in his recovery. However, Gareca had made an erratic and unintentional decision and had to wait 35 minutes.

Vicente Pizarro: Ingresó para colaborarar with Pulgar en la content. Do a cabezazo on the way, test the distance and see the basic criteria with the balón. The best of Chile.

Gonzalo Tapia: The maximum speed and activity are just before the catch. There was one of the recoverable bites.

Jean Meneses: There is no open solution. A penalty imposed by the referee of the party became a penalty.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *